The pope – Successor to Peter?

• No evidence in the New Testament that Peter was in Rome.
• No evidence for an immediate “successor” to Peter, not even in Rom.
• No mention of a bishop
of Rome in the New Testament or in the earliest Christian sources:
not in Paul’s Epistle to the Romans and not in the Letter of the Romans to the Corinthians.
• Nevertheless, early evidence for the graves of the apostles Peter and Paul in Rome.
• Around the middle of
the 3rd Century, Bishop Stephen of Rome viewed himself as the successor
of Peter and claimed
a primacy over all other bishops.

Hans Küng,
Is the Papacy reformable?
 

Paradigm shifts in Christianity


Christian Bible

Global Ethic
and Religions


Near-Eastern
Prophetic Religions

 
CHRISTIANITY
The history

• JesusMessage
• The first Christians
• Becoming Greek
• The Christ. Bibel

• Constantinople

• Moscow
• Orthod. Churches

• Rome – The pope

rot rot rot rot rot rot rot rot rot rot rot rot rot rot rot rot rot rot rot